Someone who claimed to be „Astrophysician“ wrote:
„You cannot deny global time and then quietly reintroduce it through L/(c±v).“
If time is only local, then a truly global time cannot simply be smuggled back in through L/(c±v) as if one universal ordering already existed.
To make such a global ordering analytically meaningful across infinitely many local times, you run straight into a choice problem of the kind set theory exposes, with all the usual consequences.
Of course, you can instead define a non-time, an abstract “no-time,” but then you still have to show how that object connects back to physical reality.
Without that bridge, you are left with an indeterminate nothing, not with a resolved treatment of infinity.
So unless you can produce a real antithesis that actually closes that gap, good luck—> nobody has managed it so far.
This is the problem you will have:
because of infinitely many possible local times.
If you get the Fields Medal, I will send you a present.
Until then, I cannot take this seriously.
Everyone knows infinity exists, but no one, except perhaps a god, can calculate it.
As far as I know, Chuck Norris is the only one who has ever counted to infinity twice.
At best, the axiom of choice would let you formalize the existence of such an ordering.
But formalizing an existence claim is not the same as solving the problem.
The physical bridge would still be missing.
PS:
Beside that c is invariant and therefor the sentence itself is bullshit anyway.